For decades there was just one single dependable way for you to keep information on a personal computer – with a hard disk drive (HDD). Nonetheless, this kind of technology is already expressing its age – hard drives are really loud and sluggish; they are power–hungry and tend to produce a lot of warmth for the duration of intensive operations.

SSD drives, alternatively, are quick, consume way less energy and are also much cooler. They feature a new strategy to file access and data storage and are years in front of HDDs with regards to file read/write speed, I/O efficiency and then energy capability. Discover how HDDs fare against the more recent SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

A result of a revolutionary new solution to disk drive performance, SSD drives make it possible for considerably quicker data access rates. Having an SSD, data file access times are much lower (as little as 0.1 millisecond).

Image

The concept driving HDD drives dates back to 1954. Even though it’s been noticeably processed throughout the years, it’s even now can’t stand up to the revolutionary ideas driving SSD drives. Using today’s HDD drives, the top file access speed it is possible to achieve may differ in between 5 and 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

The random I/O performance is very important for the general performance of any data file storage device. We have executed substantial testing and have determined an SSD can deal with at the very least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

Hard drives provide slower data access speeds due to the aging file storage space and access technology they are using. In addition, they illustrate noticeably slower random I/O performance in comparison to SSD drives.

During Hostxv.com’s lab tests, HDD drives addressed typically 400 IO operations per second.

3. Reliability

Image

The lack of moving components and rotating disks within SSD drives, and also the latest advances in electrical interface technology have generated a significantly less risky file storage device, having a common failing rate of 0.5%.

Image

With an HDD drive to work, it must spin two metal hard disks at over 7200 rpm, having them magnetically stabilized in mid–air. They have a lots of moving elements, motors, magnets along with other tools loaded in a tiny location. Therefore it’s no surprise that the common rate of failing of the HDD drive can vary in between 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSDs don’t have moving components and require hardly any cooling power. In addition, they demand very little electricity to operate – lab tests have established that they can be operated by a normal AA battery.

As a whole, SSDs use up between 2 and 5 watts.

Image

HDD drives are renowned for staying noisy. They want further energy for cooling down purposes. On a web server which has a large number of HDDs running constantly, you’ll need a great number of fans to make sure they’re cooler – this makes them much less energy–effective than SSD drives.

HDDs take in between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

Because of SSD drives’ better I/O efficiency, the main hosting server CPU will be able to process file requests much faster and preserve time for different operations.

The average I/O delay for SSD drives is only 1%.

Image

HDD drives accommodate reduced accessibility speeds as compared to SSDs do, resulting for the CPU being required to hang on, whilst reserving assets for the HDD to locate and give back the demanded file.

The regular I/O delay for HDD drives is about 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

It’s time for some real–world instances. We competed a complete platform backup on a server only using SSDs for data storage uses. In that process, the average service time for an I/O demand stayed beneath 20 ms.

Image

During the exact same trials using the same hosting server, this time equipped out using HDDs, overall performance was noticeably slower. All through the web server back up process, the normal service time for I/O requests fluctuated between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

You can actually check out the real–world benefits of utilizing SSD drives every single day. For instance, on a hosting server pre–loaded with SSD drives, a full back up is going to take simply 6 hours.

Image

On the other hand, with a hosting server with HDD drives, an identical data backup takes three to four times as long in order to complete. A complete back–up of an HDD–driven server normally takes 20 to 24 hours.

Should you want to automatically raise the overall performance of your websites and never have to adjust any kind of code, an SSD–operated hosting solution is a good choice. Look at our Linux cloud website hosting packages and also our VPS – our solutions include quick SSD drives and are available at cost–effective price points.

  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Each one of our Virtual Private Servers is configured for you completely free. 99.9% network uptime. Full SSH/full root access.

  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Preview the tools and characteristics offered by our Virtual Private Servers. You could begin with a smaller VPS package and upgrade with a click as your necessities increase.
  • Compare our hosting plans

  • Contact Us

  •  
  • You can get in touch with us 24/7 by email or by utilizing our super–fast ticketing platform. We offer a 1–hour reply–back time warranty.